The pharmaceutical industry is trying to halt a bipartisan effort to delay a controversial rebate rule to pay for an infrastructure package.
A bipartisan group of senators is exploring how to pay for a roughly $1 trillion infrastructure package and one of the reported methods is to delay a rule that would eliminate the safe harbor for Medicare Part D rebates. The rule, which creates a new safe harbor for discounts offered at the point-of-sale, is expected to go into effect on Jan. 1, 2023.
No final decision has been made on the payfors to fund the package or how long of a delay would be included. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has teed up a procedural vote to advance the package Wednesday.
The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association, a top drug lobbying group, took a preemptive shot to avert any delay in the rebate rule.
“Despite railing against high drug costs on the campaign trail, lawmakers are threatening to gut a rule that would provide patients meaningful relief at the pharmacy,” said Debra DeShong, executive vice president of public affairs for PhRMA, in a statement.
DeShong added that including a delay in the infrastructure package will “provide health insurers and drug middlemen a windfall and turn Medicare into a piggy bank to fund projects that have nothing to do with lowering out-of-pocket costs.”
The rebate rule was released under the Trump administration and sought to address Part D drug rebates that drug makers offer to pharmacy benefit managers in exchange for participation on their formularies. Rebates had a safe harbor that provides protection from federal anti-kickback laws. The rule would get rid of this safe harbor and replace it with a new protection for discounts offered at the pharmacy counter.
Former Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar touted the rule as a method to get rid of rebates, which he has called a kickback that drug makers are forced to give to PBMs and insurers.
But the rule was withdrawn in 2019 after concerns from the White House that it would raise Part D premiums for seniors. It was later resurrected in late 2020.
PBMs and insurers have fervently fought the regulation, pointing to a report from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services actuaries that the rule would raise premiums by 19%.
A report from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected that the rule would increase federal spending by $177 billion through 2029. The increase in spending would come from an increase in premiums and drugmakers implementing a chargeback system where they withhold some of the discounts they previously negotiated with payers, the report said.
The bipartisan infrastructure package includes roughly $1 trillion in spending on projects such as roads and IT infrastructure.
It is being considered separately from a $3.5 trillion package that includes several healthcare priorities such as expanding Medicare benefits to add dental, hearing and vision. Democratic senators also hope to give Medicare the power to negotiate for lower drug prices.